References

  • Price P et al. Dressing-related pain in patients with chronic wounds: an international patient perspective. International Wound Journal, 2008.
    Soon K et al. Pain-induced stress: a barrier to wound healing. Wounds UK, 2006.
  • Marucha P.T et al. Mucosal wound healing is impaired by examination stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1998.
  • Ebrecht M et al. Perceived stress and cortisol levels predict speed of wound healing in healthy male adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2004.
  • Solowiej K et al. Review of the relationship between stress and wound healing: part 1. Journal of Wound Care, 2009.
  • Upton D et al. Pain and stress as contributors to delayed wound healing. Wound Practice and Research, 2010.
  • Broadbent E et al. The psychology of wound healing.Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 2012.
  • Upton D. et al. The Impact of Atraumatic vs Conventional Dressings on Pain and Stress in Patients with Chronic Wounds. Submitted and approved for publication, Journal of Wound Care, 2012.
  • White R. A Multinational survey of the assessment of pain when removing dressings. Wounds UK 2008.
  • Eagle M. Clinical report, Mölnlycke Health Care 1998.
  • Taylor R. Journal of Wound Care 1999;8(9):429-30.
  • Young T. Community Nurse 1999;5(10):53-4.
  • Edwards J. Journal of Community Nursing 1998;12(10):22-6.
  • Marconi R, Laverda F, Trevisan G. Poster Presentation European Wound Management Association, Helsinki, Finland, 2009.
  • Barraziol R, Fraccalenta E, Schiavon M. Poster Presentation European Wound Management Association, Helsinki, Finland, 2009. Collin O. Poster Presentation at SAWC, EWMA & AWMA 2010.
  • Wiberg AB et al. Preventing maceration with a soft silicone dressing: in-vitro evaluations. Poster presented at the 3rd Congress of the WUWHS, Toronto, Canada, 2008.
  • Meaume S et al. A study to compare a new self adherent soft silicone dressing with a self adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Management, 2003.
  • Burgmann P et al. A silicone-coated nylon dressing reduces healing time in burned paediatric patients in comparison with standard sulfadiazine   treatment: a prospective randomized trial. Burns
    1998;24(7):609-12.
  • Dahlstrom KK. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 1995:29(4): 325-7.
  • Gotschall CS et al. Prospective, randomized study of the effi cacy of Mepitel on children with partial-thickness scalds. J Burn Care Rehabil 1998;19(4):279-83.
  • Patton et al. An open, prospective randomized pilot investigation evaluating pain with the use of a soft silicone wound contact layer, Mepitel® One, vs. Bridal Veil and staples used on split thickness
    skin grafts as a primary dressing, Oral presentation, ABA, USA, 2012.
  • Dykes PJ et al. Effect of adhesive dressings on the stratum corneum of the skin. Journal of Wound Care, 2001.
  • Waring M et al. An evalution of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives. Journal of wound care, vol 22, No 9, September 2011.
  • White R. Evidence for atraumatic soft silicone wound dressing use. Wounds UK 2005.

 

Share this