Infection prevention

Surgical double gloving with puncture indication for extra safety

The key to maximum safety is making sure that punctures in surgical gloves can be detected as rapidly as possible. The Biogel® Indicator System's puncture indications are clear1, fast1 and large1 – all important factors to immediate puncture detection and a clear path to safety and reduced risk of infection.

A 2014 Cochrane Review concludes that double gloving reduces the risk of an inner-glove perforation by 71% compared to single gloving2

The same Cochrane Review concludes that indicator gloves increase the detection of glove perforations during operations on average by 90% compared to standard single and double gloves.

Biogel Indicator System detects up to 97% of punctures3

Protection you can see

The Biogel Indicator System is unique in that it offers vividly visible puncture detection in three proven ways:

  • Clear1 – The colour of the inner glove is selected based on colour physics, maximizing the sensitivity of the human eye.
  • Fast1 – The gloves are designed to make a puncture visible as fast as possible and to ensure that the regions of indication grow quickly.
  • Large1 – The Biogel puncture indication is large and visible from a distance.

The Biogel PI Micro Indicator system gives significantly more vivid indication than other synthetic double-gloving combinations, making punctures visible quickly.

How the puncture indication system works

The Biogel Indicator System is made up of a dark-coloured underglove and a straw-coloured overglove.

Normally, the overglove blocks out most of the underglove's colour. When fluid gets between the two layers, light passes through the overglove and reveals the underglove.

NoImage

(mm:ss)

Take our online course

Take our e-learning courses on puncture indication and double gloving to learn more about infection prevention and control

E-learning

The Cochrane review: Proof to back it up

When talking to healthcare professionals about prevention strategies, double gloving is our most important message. You can see why from these important findings in Cochrane Collaboration's systematic review of double gloving2,4.

Objectives

The Cochrane review aimed to:

  • determine whether there is a clinically significant difference in using extra gloves for preventing needlestick injuries during surgery
  • evaluate whether double gloving has a negative impact on the healthcare professional's hand skills (dexterity)
  • discover whether additional glove protection reduces the number of underglove perforations

Methodology

  • Thirty four randomized controlled trials measuring glove perforations were included. Increasing numbers of glove layers (single, double, triple) were evaluated2.
  • First review compared single gloving, double gloving and coloured puncture-indicating systems; second review added four additional gloving methods (glove liner, cloth overgloves, steel-weave overgloves and triple gloves)2.
  • Risk was determined through the measurement of perforations and self-reported needlestick injuries. Dexterity was measured via self-reporting and perforation rate2.

Results

Chart describing the Cochran modelSingle versus double gloving: 11 percent of gloves perforated using single gloves; 3 percent perforated with double gloving4.

Puncture detection proved to be significantly improved for Biogel Puncture Indication System gloves4.

The evidence confirms that double gloving provides better protection against accidental perforations and needlestick injuries and does not significantly influence dexterity when measured as the number of outer glove perforations2,4.

References

  1. MHC on file Report no. 887.
  2. Mischke C, Verbeek JH, Saarto A, Lavoie MC, PahwaM, Ijaz S. Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD009573. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009573.pub2.
  3. Wigmore SJ & Rainey JB, BJS 1994: 81: 1480.
  4. Tanner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. Art No.: CD003087. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2 (second review 2000-2005).
Share this

Further reading and recommended products

Double gloving for complete protection
Double gloving for complete protection

Double gloving is proven to reduce the risk of spreading...

Biogel Puncture Indication System
Biogel Puncture Indication System

Course about the Biogel PI System and the protection...

Double gloving clinical evidence
Double gloving clinical evidence

Course about clinical evidence supporting double gloving

Accelerator-free gloves to avoid chemical...

Hypoallergenic surgical gloves manufactured without the chemicals commonly...

Biogel PI Micro Indicator
Biogel PI Micro Indicator

Thinner puncture indication glove for improved tactile...

Biogel PI Micro
Biogel PI Micro

Puncture indication glove thinner than Biogel PI UltraTouch for extra tactile...

Biogel PI UltraTouch M
Biogel PI UltraTouch M

When extra grip and control is needed, such as in ENT, neurosurgical and...

Biogel PI UltraTouch G
Biogel PI UltraTouch G

When extra grip and control is needed, such as in ENT, neurosurgical and...

Biogel PI OrthoPro
Biogel PI OrthoPro

When robust barrier protection is necessary, such as in orthopaedic surgery

Biogel PI Indicator System
Biogel PI Indicator System

Double-gloving system recommended for all types of...

Biogel PI Pro-Fit
Biogel PI Pro-Fit

Puncture indication glove that helps reduce hand and thumb fatigue during...

Biogel PI UltraTouch
Biogel PI UltraTouch

Puncture indication glove formulated for extra sensitivity, recommended...

Biogel Eclipse Indicator
Biogel Eclipse Indicator

Double-gloving solution that preserves dexterity and sensitivity

Surgical glove donning guide
Surgical glove donning guide

Video demonstrating three different surgical glove...