Advanced care for low-to-moderate-risk incisions
Discover how Mepilex® Border Post-Op meets the latest expert consensus
Recognise the risks of outdated post-operative dressings.
Despite exciting advancements in incision care solutions and paradigms,1–4 the same post-operative dressings used five decades ago are still regularly being used.5 These dressings are associated with a variety of problems that advanced dressings can often minimise or even prevent, including, but not limited to:
- Surgical site complications6–11
- Frequent dressing changes6, 7, 12
- Delayed healing13
- Patient pain and discomfort6
- High clinical workload and costs 7–9

Learn what types of post-operative dressings experts recommend
To address these and other issues in incision care, six consensus meetings were held across the world between 2019 and 2022.4 The experts discussed key topics and reached broad agreements in two areas:
- The ideal post-operative dressing should possess these six properties:4
- Be flexible, enabling patient movement
- Stay on well
- Be highly absorbent
- Protect the skin from damage, such as blisters
- Be shower proof
- Eliminate dead space between the dressing and wound
- The post-operative dressing should be changed only when clinically necessary, promoting undisturbed wound healing (UWH).4 This may reduce the risk of surgical site complications, patient discomfort, clinical workloads and costs4, 71, 13
-
International consensus meeting
A summary of findings from the meetings held between 2019 and 2022 to discuss key areas of incision care, including the properties of the ideal post-operative dressing.
Download a summary of the findings -
Undisturbed wound healing
Focusing on incision care in oncology and orthopaedics, this report summarises the findings from several studies on the efficacy and implementation of undisturbed wound healing (UWH).
Download a report about the benefits of UWH
Talk to our experts
To create a positive impact, we build mutually beneficial relationships with employees, customers and the people in our communities.
Start your conversation hereAdhere to the expert consensus with Mepilex® Border Post-Op
Mepilex® Border Post-Op, featuring Safetac® technology, is our cutting-edge solution for the management of closed incisions with low to elevated risk of surgical site complications and low to high levels of exudate. Offering up to 14 days of wear time,12 it promotes undisturbed wound healing and possesses, with clinical evidence, all six properties of the ideal post-operative dressing as agreed by the experts.4, 14 As such, Mepilex® Border Post-Op embodies the recommendations from the international meetings, enabling you to adhere to expert consensus and provide the latest standard of incision care.

Mepilex® Border Post-Op
- Suitable for low-to-elevated-risk incisions with low to high exudate levels
- Features Safetac® technology, minimising damage to the wound and the skin and pain at removal.
- Can be worn for up to 14 days, promoting undisturbed wound healing
- Possesses all six properties of the ideal post-operative dressing as agreed by experts
Explore our resources on Mepilex® Border Post-Op and optimal incision care
-
Watch The Cut, our YouTube video series
Hosted by Dr Kylie Sandy-Hodgetts, the series features discussions with experts about how to improve incision care outcomes.
Watch The Cut by Mölnlycke on Youtube -
Listen to Wound Care Voices
What are the problems associated with using cheap dressings? Featuring orthopaedic surgeon Rhidian Morgan-Jones, hosted by Andrea Culshaw and Magnus Enerbäck.
Listen to the episode Spotify
Learn much more in our Clinical Learning Hub
Covering essential topics for optimal incision care, our Clinical Learning Hub features a growing range of educational materials, from articles and webinars to podcasts and mini-courses.
Visit our Clinical Learning Hub-
References
- Scalise A et al. Int Wound J. 2016;13(6):1260–81.
- Rosenbaum AJ et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(23):833–43.
- Fani N et al. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024;19(3):277-91.
- Sandy-Hodgetts K et al. Incision care and dressing selection in surgical wounds: Findings from a series of international meetings. Wounds International, 2022. https://woundsinternational.com/consensus-documents/incision-care-and-dressing-selection-surgical-wounds-findings-series-international-meetings/
- Queen et al. A dressing history. Int Wound J. 2004 Apr;1(1):59-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2004.0009.x. PMID: 16722898; PMCID: PMC7951354.
- Bredow J et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(13):213–9.
- Zarghooni K et al. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015;81(4):768–75.
- Ravenscroft MJ et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88(1):18–22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1963649/
- Hopper GP et al. J Wound Care. 2012;21(4):200–3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22584680/
- Zurcher S et al. Reducing postoperative surgical site infections in coronary artery bypass graft patients. Poster presented at: [?]
- Peghetti A. Prevention of post-operative surgical site complications: A quality improvement project. Poster presented at: European Wound Management Association (EWMA); 9–11 May 2018; EXPO, Krakow, Poland.
- Van Overschelde P et al. J Wound Care. 2024;33(Supp. 8):S17–S26.
- Wounds International, 2024. Undisturbed wound healing: Identifying a new concept in wound care and promoting optimal conditions for post-operative healing. Wounds International, London. https://woundsinternational.com/supplements/are-incisions-the-forgotten-wound-rethink-incision-care-to-improve-patient-outcomes/
- Instructions for use