Burn treatment

Gentle care for burns

Effective burn healing for faster recovery

Most burns are painful and can even be life-changing for the patient. With the right burn treatment and therapies throughout the healing journey, we can help patients return to daily life faster.

The Power of Gentle

​Our product portfolio does not make compromises. It provides effective care and reduces additional trauma and suffering – every step of the way. This means undisturbed wound healing, improved cost-effectiveness, and a better patient experience 2-3, 10-12 .

Our approach to healing burns

​

  • 1. Effective burn healing

    Undisturbed wound healing should be promoted. Using dressings that minimise the risk of maceration, provide an antimicrobial barrier and allow for long wear-time is essential. Pain and stress are contributors to delayed wound healing, therefore it is also key to select a dressing that minimises additional trauma9.

  • 2. Patient satisfaction

    Experiencing pain and distress is not only a bad foundation for healing but also agonising for the patient. Choosing a dressing that minimises pain and anxiety at dressing change will contribute to higher patient satisfaction.

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness

    Cost-effectiveness is an important factor in implementing a treatment regimen for burns. Dressings associated with less dressings changes, nursing time or analgesics use can reduce total cost of care.

A photo of a hand with a burn dressing.

A gentle healing journey

Most burns are painful and can even be life-changing for the patient. With the right burn treatment and therapies throughout the healing journey, we can help patients return to daily life faster.​

Talk to our experts

To create a positive impact, we build mutually beneficial relationships with employees, customers and the people in our communities.

Start your conversation here

Pain reduction enabled by Safetac® technology​

Safetac® is the original less-pain contact layer with silicone adhesion. It moulds softly to skin without sticking to the moist wound and it can be easily be removed without damaging the wound or skin1-5,7. That means less pain for your patients1-6,8. Safetac also protects new tissue and intact skin – so wounds remain undisturbed to support faster natural healing. Read more about Safetac here.

  • Without Safetac®

  • With Safetac®

  • Information for Health Care Professionals​

    Learn more
  • Information for ​burn survivors

    Learn more

Wound stories

Every burn has its story. Listen to burn survivors and caregivers when they share their experience on burns.

Product selection guide​

​Our burns selection guide can help you discuss how to help your patients return to normal daily life

    1. Van Overschelde, P. et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing two wound dressings used after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. Poster presentation at 5th Congress of the WUWHS, Florence, Italy, 2016.​
    2. Silverstein P. et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam. Journal of Burn Care and Research, 2011.​
    3. Gee Kee E.L. et al. Randomized controlled trial of three burns dressings for partial thickness burns in children. Burns, 2015.​
    4. David F. et al. A randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing the performance of a soft silicone-coated wound contact layer (Mepitel One) with a lipidocolloid wound contact layer (UrgoTul) in the treatment of acute wounds. International Wound Journal, 2017.​
    5. Patton M.L. et al.. An open, prospective, randomized pilot investigation evaluating pain with the use of a soft silicone wound contact layer vs bridal veil and staples on split thickness skin grafts as a primary dressing. Journal of burn care & research, 2013​
    6. Bredow J. et al. Evaluation of Absorbent Versus Conventional Wound Dressing. A Randomized Controlled Study in Orthopedic Surgery. Deutsche Arzteblatt International, 2018.​
    7. Meaume S. et al. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Management, 2003.​
    8. Gotschall C.S. et al. Prospective, randomized study of the efficacy of Mepitel on children with partial-thickness scalds. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, 1998.​
    9. Upton D, Solowiej K. Pain and stress as contributors to delayed wound healing. Wound Practice and Research 2010, 18(3): 114-122.​
    10. Gee Kee EL, Stockton K, Kimble RM et al. Cost-effectiveness of silver dressings for paediatric partial thickness burns: An economic evaluation from a randomized controlled trial. Burns 2017, 43(4): 724-732.​
    11. Aggarwala S, Harish V, Roberts S et al. Treatment of partial thickness burns: a prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing Biobrane, Acticoat, Mepilex Ag and Aquacel Ag. J Burn Care Res 2020, 42(5): 934-43.​
    12. Tang H, Lv G, Fu J et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter investigation evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of Mepilex Ag versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015, 78(5): 1000-1007.​

    ​

    ​

    ​

    ​

    ​

    ​

Select country

Get knowledge, learn about our products, get support and more.

Estonia

No markets

Find jobs, our financial reports and more.

Mölnlycke corporate

Are you a healthcare professional?

This webpage contains information that is only intended for healthcare professionals. By selecting ‘Yes, I am’ you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

No, I am not a Health Care Professional