No more trauma, discover the power of gentle
Burn wounds are complex and challenging. Infection risk, pain and exudate can delay healing, while dressing adherence and frequent dressing changes may cause additional trauma to fragile newly formed tissue. Optimising wound management is critical to protecting the wound bed, supporting re-epithelialisation and improving the patient experience.
Discover our products to support gentle burn healing
Want to read about the latest study within the fileld?
-
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand Hypochlorous acid versus normal saline solution for the cleansing of indeterminate-depth burn wounds: a randomized, controlled trial
-
test
Why is adhesive silicone dressings a good choise?
-
References
1. Gee Kee EL, Kimble RM, Cuttle L, Khan A, Stockton KA. Randomized controlled trial of three burns dressings for partial thickness burns in children. Burns 2015, 41(5):946-955.
2. Silverstein P, Heimbach D, Meites H et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver containing soft silicone foam dressing (intervention) vs silver sulfadiazine cream. J Burn Care Res 2011, 32(6): 617-626.
3. Gee Kee EL, Stockton K, Kimble RM et al. Cost-effectiveness of silver dressings for paediatric partial thickness burns: An economicevaluation from a randomized controlled trial. Burns 2017, 43(4): 724-732.
4. Aggarwala S, Harish V, Roberts S et al. Treatment of partial thickness burns: aprospective, randomised controlled trial comparing Biobrane, Acticoat, Mepilex Ag and Aquacel Ag. J Burn Care Res 2020, 42(5): 934-43.
5. Tang H, Lv G, Fu J et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter investigation evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of Mepilex Ag versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015, 78(5): 1000-1007.